Menu Close

what the bleep do we know debunked

Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? Ive not seen the movie, and dont intend to, but David Alberts book on Quantum Mechanics and Experience is one of the best things Ive read on the interpretation of QM. Fred Allen Wolf Knight's compound outside the town of Yelm has been built over the former horse-breeding grounds: The estate consists of JZ's present home, a white 12,800 square foot French chateau styled 4-bedroom house, her original home (a 1,600 sq. Wow, indeed! It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. bleep blorp!" I implore all of you to ignore Rubio's critics and acknowledge that the senator from Florida is absolutely correct. [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. HCI president Peter Vegso stated that in regard to this book, "What the Bleep is the quantum leap in the New Age world," and "by marrying science and spirituality, it is the foundation of future thought."[5]. The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. A: Absolutely. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. Gifted and talented kids: how do you nurture a curious mind. It's there. However, it contends that the empty space is not that empty, it is only the human mind that is unable to see beyond the emptiness. We don't know which way it's going to go. What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. Yet, the battle still ranges, and we now know where we can class the distinctions of LQG and String theorists? Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. The brain wasn't born yesterday. asks nothing but . We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. Joe Dispenza Our work isn't possible without your support. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. 4. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . I am glad that someone else thought that that movie was a bunch of garbage. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? But sounding like magic and being magic are two different things. That would be, very hard to quantify:). The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. "I begin the book with a quote from Feynman that says, 'Reality takes precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled,'" he told me. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. "What the bleep. Some lost their entire life savings. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. Nasa found something. Do We (K)now!? And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Quantum mechanics may play a role at some level in the way the brain works just as it may play a role in photosynthesis. Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. has been described as "a kind of New Age answer to The Passion of the Christ and other films that adhere to traditional religious teachings. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. " " what the bleep do we know ( 2 ) Full HD 2 . you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. . [17] Eric Scerri in a review for Committee for Skeptical Inquiry dismisses it as "a hodgepodge of all kinds of crackpot nonsense," where "science [is] distorted and sensationalized". He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. Dr Emoto takes photos of crystals formed in freezing water. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. Mon August 23, 2021: The US Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? Some movies are so bad, they're funny. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). Science and engineering are important for our future, and anything that engages the public can only be a good thing." That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Pingback: Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, Pingback: For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. for only $16.05 $11/page. Study Guide", "Teaching physics mysteries versus pseudoscience", "Review: What The Bleep Do We Know!? But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. (stylized as What t #$*! But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. Some ideas discussed in the film are: In the narrative segments of the film, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives. There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013. Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. A: Of course it does. If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" The year's most unexpected indie hit in American cinemas - a film about quantum physics - is about to open here. ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . "What the Bleep" misses opportunities to focus credibly on the fascinating work people like Newberg have been doing, and makes the science-and-faith field seem like quackery. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. is god-awful. Prominent if you go by citations that is. ISHEAGU MASSACRE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: Isheagu is a town whose origin is traceable to the Eastern part of the contraption called Nigeria. But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. Last night I went to see a movie which was advertised as being about quantum physics, called What the Bleep Do We Know?. We're not using either superconductivity or superfluidity yet on the scale that I think people thought we might. Get ABC Sciences weekly newsletter Science Updates, The 'underground astronaut' in search of ancient bones, Voyager probes still signalling from the edge of the Solar System, Solar eclipses: Everything you need to know, Five ways your smartphone could help save lives, Chinese scientists use satellite to smash quantum entanglement record, Einstein's light bending theory directly observed in distant stars for first time, Third gravitational wave detection puts new spin on black holes. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience. While the (probabilistic) predictions of quantum mechanics are, as far . It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. and published a study guide. It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. Not everything is possible. Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! [12], Richard Dawkins stated that "the authors seem undecided whether their theme is quantum theory or consciousness. (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! Z. Knight and heavily features commentary from 'Ramtha', an ancient Atlantian general who is apparently speaking through Knight. Q: Some scientists, such as Sir Roger Penrose, have talked about neurons as quantum systems. Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. After a lesson in quantum mechanics from a precocious kid on a . (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. 3. (It's all to do with photons of light from your measuring instrument hitting the poor electron and knocking it for six). Though not marketed as such, those who have seen it note that it degenerates into an extended infomercial for channeler J. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman. Featured individuals [ edit] The film features interview segments of: Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. Moreover, assume that they want your money. But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. Beyond fear, beyond anger. It's certainly not. Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. What could be worse than being aware of every tiny detail that your brain handles from phosphate levels to heart rate and hair growth. It is just a movie. Film / What the #$*! In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? ", Critics offered mixed reviews as seen on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes, where it scored a "Rotten" 34% score with an average score of 4.6/10, based on 77 reviews. Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far: ReportWire.org info@planettvstudios.com nicholas@planettvstudios.com Eric@planettvstudios.com Julie@planettvstudios.com Website YouTube Channel Facebook Twitter Instagram Planet TV Studios LHTV LLC I don't know how many times I've heard people say, "Oh, I love quantum mechanics because I'm really into meditation, or I love the spiritual benefits that it brings me." We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. This is the person who teaches the brain science in RSE. We use it to assign probabilities to possible measurement outcomes on the basis of actual measurement outcomes. [18] A BBC reviewer described it as "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". While Amanda waits for a commuter train, she (and we) are shown the work of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, who has photographed water after exposing it to different emotions. "The protagonist, Amanda, played by Academy Award-Winning actress Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. Quotes From the Movies Science Of The Mind Fifth Dimension Joe Dispenza Get What You Want Neurons Brain Spirituality The infinite info that the brain is processing every single second tells us there is more to the world then we're perceiving it. What the Bleep Do We Know? Consciousness must be involved. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles this only applies to sub-atomic particlesa rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. Miceal Ledwith [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. Awash in New Age theorizing, real world science and the intellectually unfathomable notion of quantum mechanics, What the 'Bleep' Do We Know!? They don't go anywhere, Fred. It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. During the Fall of the year Amanda begins to see the world in new and different ways when she begins to question her role in life, her relationships with her career and men and what it all means. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. You can't change the world by thinking about it. Producing, scripting, and co-directing the film, What the BLEEP went on to become a global phenomenon, with well over 100 million viewers experiencing the BLEEP. But they add that the film shows quantum mysteries selectively to shore up metaphysical points. He claims the drop was achieved. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie, Robert Bailey Jr.. A fictional photographer's quest to spiritually rediscover herself is interspersed with documentary footage of scientists and theologians discussing the philosophical aspects of quantum physics. We're also connected to the universe by gravity, and we're connected to the planets by gravity. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness. You are free to comment as you wish. Do we know" . Photos View All Photos Movie Info Amanda, a divorced photographer, has a fantastic experience when life begins to unravel around her, revealing the cellular,. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. Whether or not you buy into its "you are God in the making" philosophy, "What the Bleep Do We Know?" It was really hard to sit through. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. It took a while, but the comparison finally came through on the association of strings, as a quantum mechanical perspective, and the relationship to that movie. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole.

Is Scalping Illegal In Canada, How Did Terence Mckenna Get A Brain Tumor, Roland Welker Joe Rogan, Tucker Carlson Mother Lisa Vaughn, Rubbermaid Chicken Coop, Articles W